
It’s the beginning of the end for what will likely be herald as the most successful franchise in film history. Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1, the 7th film installment of the Harry Potter saga, is suppose to function as a spring board for the most anticipated portion of the protagonist’s story arc. Unfortunately, at the core of this film, loyal fans are only rewarded with even more anticipation.
In part 1 of this 2-part finale, Harry and his inseparable mates Ron and Hermione are on the lamb from Lord Voldemort and his minions. Laterally, the trio is also in a quest to find and destroy the four remaining horcruxes, which encase splinters of the dark lord’s soul. In fact it’s not just Harry who’s being hunted, anyone from non wizard or witch bloodlines is in danger as Voldemort attempts a takeover of the Ministry of Magic. With the “Wizarding World” under his control, Voldemort’s only remaining caveat to his supremacy would be the reminder of his greatest failure . . . Harry Potter himself.
The inherent flaw with Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1 is that unlike the rest of the films in the series, this chapter does not hold firm as a stand-alone story. It’s like going to see an Aerosmith concert with Huey Lewis and the News as the opening act. The only problem is that after 2 hours and 20 minutes of Huey Lewis, he leaves the stage and tells the audience that Aerosmith will be out to play in about 8 months. Deathly Hallows Part 1 is the chocolate cookie part of an Oreo that just won’t twist off; it only serves to set up the cream that cannot be accessed and in the end creates more frustration than satisfaction. The film is simply manic, following the core three characters on a roller coaster ride that spins at 55 mph but only inches forward. Too much time is spent trying to strengthen and crystallize the relationship between Harry, Ron and Hermione. Other fan favorites such as Alan Rickman’s Severus Snape or Mathew Lewis’ Neville Longbottom deserved more than just a one-shot cameo, no matter how the source material was constructed.
Perhaps the eminent factor to this film’s square-peg syndrome is the lack of the series’ most colossal staple, the Hogwarts School. Hogwarts, the school where Harry and his peers have been learning magic for the past 6 films, is one of the most important and overlooked characters of the franchise. To see the condition and state of Hogwarts in this film would have been very satisfying even if it were skewed by dark influences. In fact, that revelation would have strengthened the film’s overall and encompassing emotions to a higher degree than characters constantly running through the woods.
What Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1 does manage to achieve is the seamless and continuing submersion of darkness where The Half-Blood Prince left off. David Yates is back in the director’s chair for his third Potter film (Order of the Phoenix, 2007, Half-Blood Prince, 2009), which was the appropriate choice as he carries out the facelift of mood and undertones from the last film. Yates shrouds this film in chaos with more of a documentary “shaky cam,” style to convincingly sell the fact that the protagonist’s lives have turned upside down.
The silver lining to the film’s obsession with the trio’s relationship is that it gave the actors a chance to somewhat expand on their characters. Performances from Daniel Radcliffe and Rupert Grint as Harry and Ron respectively, were just as solid as their past performances. Radcliffe though was able to show a little more gusto than he’s used to with his character as Harry exhibits small flashes of why he’s the “chosen one,” still waiting for his “Neo” moment. However, it was the character of Hermione played once again by Emma Watson that really captured center stage in this chapter. Hermione is the most intellectual of the close-knit chums and takes on the responsibility of keeping them safe in their fugitive status. Watson was able to deeply tap into Hermione’s angst of balancing her love for her best friend (Harry) and her boyfriend (Ron) while simultaneously trying to remain strong and focused on the task at hand.
Since Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1 was based on only a portion of a complete book, it certainly plays out as such, and to no extreme fault of its own will most likely be the least replayed chapter of the series. However, there were some golden opportunities overlooked by the writers and director that could have eased rabid fan’s appetites as they wait a long 8 months for steak and potatoes after dinning only on Saltines.
Story: 7.0
Acting: 8.0
Writing: 7.5
Captivation: 7.5
Replay Value: 6.0
Total = 7.2
Member of the Boxxet Network of Blogs, Videos and Photos






